Спустя несколько часов после того, как Дональд Трамп заявил журналистам, что встретится с Ким Чен Ыном в конце этого года, Северная Корея запустила около 10 баллистических ракет малой дальности из района Пхеньяна. Сеул назвал это нарушением ...
Сообщение Planet-Today.com. Перевод заголовка и краткого описания выполнен автоматически.
Hours after Donald Trump told reporters he would meet Kim Jong Un later this year, North Korea launched around 10 short-range ballistic missiles from the Pyongyang area. Seoul called it a violation of UN resolutions. Pyongyang’s most powerful spokeswoman said the personal chemistry between the two leaders remains “excellent” — and then dismissed the scaled-back US-South Korea drills as unworthy of comment. The numbers on North Korea’s nuclear stockpile still do not match.
 |
| Source: Video Screenshot |
Key Takeaways by Planet Today
Timing is the message: The launches came the same afternoon Trump publicly committed to a meeting, after Kim Yo Jong had already poured cold water on claims of recent leader-to-leader contact.
Drills were already cut: Ulchi Freedom Shield was shortened by about a week at Washington’s suggestion. The Pentagon said training objectives were not degraded. Allies still worried about the signal.
The arsenal dispute is public: Trump said 57 “very powerful” nuclear weapons. South Korea’s defence minister cited a working range of 80–120, later noting the figure came from private research institutes.
Pyongyang left a narrow door open: Kim Yo Jong stressed Kim Jong Un’s “good memories and feelings” toward Trump while insisting US “hostile policy” had not changed and that sovereign military activity is separate from personal relations.
Seoul is trying to hold two positions: President Lee Jae Myung said he would support Trump’s peacemaking efforts. Defence Minister Ahn Gyu-back said South Korea still will not officially recognise the North as a nuclear-weapon state.
What happened on Thursday
South Korea’s Joint Chiefs of Staff said it detected roughly 10 short-range ballistic missiles launched from the Pyongyang area around 5 p.m. local time. The missiles flew about 300 kilometres toward the East Sea (Sea of Japan) and fell into the water. Japanese authorities separately reported multiple ballistic missiles that travelled an estimated 320 kilometres, reached a maximum altitude of about 90 kilometres, and splashed down outside Japan’s exclusive economic zone.
Seoul’s presidential office convened an emergency security meeting, condemned the launches as a violation of United Nations Security Council resolutions, and ordered heightened readiness. The Joint Chiefs said South Korean and US authorities were analysing the missiles’ specifications and that the military had strengthened surveillance in case of further launches.
South Korean Defence Minister Ahn Gyu-back told lawmakers the projectiles were believed to be 600 mm multiple rocket launchers — a system North Korea has previously described as capable of delivering tactical nuclear warheads and which Seoul has been tracking because it could be deployed near the inter-Korean border. That assessment, if confirmed, would place Thursday’s activity in a different category from a simple protest shot: a demonstration of a system designed for the peninsula itself.
This was not the first launch during the current exercise window. South Korean reporting noted earlier firings on 6 and 12 August that were already being read as protests against Ulchi Freedom Shield. Thursday’s barrage was larger and closer in time to Trump’s White House remarks.
Primary reporting: AFP via Yahoo, Reuters, Yonhap.
Trump’s pledge and the shortened drills
On Wednesday, Trump told reporters at the White House that he would meet Kim later this year. Asked directly, he answered, “Yeah, I will be.” He added that it was important to “get along” with Kim and that North Korea now had 57 “very powerful” nuclear weapons. He has repeatedly described their personal relationship as an asset, a theme that defined his first-term summits in 2018 and 2019.
Days earlier he had ordered the Pentagon to “substantially reduce” the annual Ulchi Freedom Shield exercises, calling them expensive and a “totally inappropriate and hostile” signal to a country he described as unthreatening and respectful. He also cited South Korea’s refusal to support US operations related to Iran. Seoul and Washington then announced the 11-day exercise would end on Friday — roughly a week earlier than planned — “at the suggestion of the US side.” The Pentagon said the reduction would cause “no degradation to US training objectives.”
The United States stations about 28,500 troops in South Korea, a presence that dates to the 1950–53 Korean War, which ended in an armistice rather than a peace treaty. Ulchi Freedom Shield is designed to prepare for a possible North Korean attack. Cutting it mid-stream, after it had already begun, was unusual enough that Asian allies and some US lawmakers publicly questioned the effect on combined readiness. That debate is covered in more detail in Trump’s Korea Drill Cut: Why Reed Calls It Inane.
Trump’s sudden emphasis on Kim has also been read in some capitals as a search for a diplomatic headline while other theatres, including the Iran conflict, remain unresolved. That is an interpretation, not a documented motive. What is documented is the sequence: order to scale back drills, public claim of a meeting this year, North Korean statement, then missiles.
What Kim Yo Jong actually said — and what she did not
Kim Yo Jong, Kim Jong Un’s sister and one of the few officials authorised to speak on US policy, released a statement via state media on Wednesday evening. She said she was “not aware” of any current communication between the two leaders and that this might be “the only thing I do not know as regards the foreign policy of our supreme leadership.” That directly contradicted Trump’s earlier claim that Kim had responded to his outreach.
At the same time she repeated that Kim Jong Un has “good memories and feelings” about Trump and that “the relationship between those two leaders is still excellent.” She dismissed the reduced drills as “unworthy of comment” and said shrinking their duration or size does not change their “provocative and aggressive” nature. She added that the exercise of North Korea’s sovereign rights to contain threats to its security is “reasonable, appropriate and essential” and “has nothing to do with the excellent relations between the leaders.”
After Thursday’s launches, later reporting attributed further remarks to her in which she framed the US decision as Seoul’s comeuppance, used “master-and-servant” language about the alliance, and mocked South Korean President Lee Jae Myung’s attempt to support Trump’s outreach while talking about more independent national defence. Readers should treat those later lines as reported in follow-up AFP copy rather than as a second official KCNA text unless Pyongyang republishes them.
Analysts who watch North Korean wording closely noted that she neither confirmed nor flatly denied a channel, kept the personal compliment intact, and restated the usual conditions: hostile policy must change, and military activity will continue until it does. That is a familiar Pyongyang pattern — leave a personal door ajar while refusing to treat a tactical concession as a strategic shift. A related reading of Seoul’s own outreach appears in South Korea’s Lee Calls for Talks to End Korean War.
“The relationship between those two leaders is still excellent. However, the US hostile policy toward the DPRK has remained unchanged.”
— Kim Yo Jong, statement carried by North Korean state media, 19 August 2026
57 versus 80–120: why the nuclear numbers do not match
Trump’s figure of 57 was unusually specific. South Korea’s Defence Minister Ahn Gyu-back told a parliamentary committee the next day that the working estimate is typically 80 to 120, while stressing that an exact official number is hard to state. He later clarified that the range came from private research organisations and that the South Korean military cannot formally confirm it because Seoul does not recognise the North as a nuclear-weapon state.
The gap is not just political. Open-source estimates have long differed depending on whether the count is assembled warheads, fissile material that could be turned into warheads, or a maximum production potential from Yongbyon and other sites. The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute and other trackers have in recent years clustered assembled-warhead estimates in a lower band (often around 50–60), while some South Korean research institutes have used higher ranges when they include material stockpiles. Trump’s 57 sits near the lower public band. Ahn’s 80–120 sits near the higher working range used in Seoul.
Ahn also said he did not believe Washington had “given up” on denuclearisation. That remains official South Korean and US policy language. It sits uneasily next to any conversation that treats the arsenal as a settled fact to be managed rather than reversed. Recognition of North Korea as a nuclear-weapon state is precisely the concession Pyongyang has demanded as a precondition for a different relationship. Seoul says it still opposes that recognition.
For a broader look at how great-power trips and signalling are being read in the region, see Why Trump’s China trip signifies the end of American primacy.
How mainstream coverage framed the day
Wire services and major broadsheets treated the launches as a familiar North Korean response to joint exercises, now complicated by Trump’s personal diplomacy. AP, Reuters, AFP, Yonhap, the Guardian and Japanese outlets all led with the number of missiles, the flight path into the East Sea, the emergency meeting in Seoul, and the contradiction between Trump’s meeting pledge and Kim Yo Jong’s claim of no current contact.
The dominant frame is sequence and legality: UN resolutions ban ballistic missile launches; the North has used them for years as both a development programme and a political instrument; cutting allied drills did not stop the launches. Coverage also noted ally anxiety — that Washington was reducing a core training event while publicly courting the country the drills are meant to deter.
That is the record as presented by governments that detect the launches and by newsrooms that quote them. It is not the only possible reading of intent. It is the one with the most official sourcing on Thursday.
What other voices are asking
Sceptics of the alliance-first view argue that Pyongyang has said for years that it will not trade its nuclear programme for temporary pauses in exercises. From that angle, a one-week cut was never going to be enough, and firing a known short-range system toward the sea is consistent with North Korea’s pattern of answering “goodwill” with a reminder of capability. Some regional commentators also argue that Kim Yo Jong’s insistence on personal warmth toward Trump is itself a signal: the North prefers leader-level deals and is willing to isolate Seoul if it can.
Critics of Trump’s move, including some US lawmakers and alliance specialists, call the drill cut a gift that was not reciprocated and a risk to combined command proficiency. They note that North Korea has deepened military cooperation with Russia and continues to expand tactical systems that matter most to South Korea, not just ICBMs that matter most to the continental United States.
A third line, heard more in analysis than in official statements, is that both sides are playing to domestic calendars. Trump has an interest in a visible foreign-policy moment. Kim has an interest in not appearing to have been bought cheaply. Lee Jae Myung has an interest in supporting talks without looking as if Seoul has been bypassed. None of those incentives require the other side to be telling the whole truth about channels, numbers, or red lines.
None of those interpretations change the physical facts: missiles were launched, they flew a few hundred kilometres, they landed at sea, and three governments issued statements within hours.
Seoul’s tightrope
President Lee Jae Myung said on Wednesday he would “do his utmost” to support Trump’s peacemaking efforts. That is consistent with his longer argument that South Korea should strengthen its own defences and reduce over-reliance on the United States, while still using US engagement if it can lower the risk of war. After the launches, his office still condemned the act and demanded it stop.
Ahn’s parliamentary answers tried to hold the old formula: do not recognise the North as a nuclear state, do not abandon denuclearisation, do not ignore the size of the arsenal. That formula is getting harder to speak in public when the US president cites a specific warhead count and says he wants to get along with the man who commands it.
The Korean War still has no peace treaty. Joint exercises exist because the armistice never became a political settlement. Every time the drills shrink or grow, both Koreas treat the change as a statement about that unfinished war. Thursday did not finish it. It restated the terms.
What is still unknown
It is not independently confirmed in open sources whether any recent letter or message actually passed between Trump and Kim. Trump said there had been a response. Kim Yo Jong said she knew of none. Both statements can be technically true if the contact was narrow, informal, or kept outside her brief. They can also be talking past each other.
It is not confirmed in public whether Thursday’s missiles were the KN-25-class 600 mm system Ahn described. Flight distance is consistent with short-range systems North Korea has tested before. Warhead type is not something a splashdown at sea reveals.
It is not known whether a meeting this year will happen, where it would be held, or what either side would put on the table. Previous Trump-Kim summits produced spectacle and a vague Singapore statement, then collapsed in Hanoi over the gap between sanctions relief and dismantlement. That gap has not closed. The arsenal has grown.
Why the curiosity is justified
The interesting fact is not that North Korea fired missiles during a US-South Korea exercise. It has done that for years. The interesting fact is the stacking of signals in 48 hours: a US president cuts a major allied drill, claims a meeting, cites a precise nuclear number, and is answered first with a carefully double-edged statement from Kim’s sister and then with a barrage from the capital region.
Readers can decide whether that looks like a rebuff, a bargaining chip, a routine training shot, or all three. The governments involved have already chosen their public sentences. The missiles, unlike the sentences, had trajectories that could be measured.
Related reading on this site: Trump’s Korea Drill Cut: Why Reed Calls It Inane · South Korea’s Lee Calls for Talks to End Korean War · Why Trump’s China trip signifies the end of American primacy.
Original source: AFP reporting, 20 August 2026. A widely circulated English version appears at Yahoo News (AFP). Parallel official and wire accounts: AP, Reuters, Yonhap, Reuters on the 80–120 estimate.
Disclaimer for fact-checkers: Launch times, flight distances and official quotes are taken from South Korean, Japanese and US statements as reported by AFP, AP, Reuters and Yonhap on 20 August 2026. Nuclear-arsenal figures are estimates, not verified inventories. Kim Yo Jong’s wording is drawn from state-media statements as translated and quoted by those wires. This article does not claim knowledge of unpublished diplomatic channels.
